A Counterfactual Anniversary: “What Ifs?” of World War I
With today marking the 100th
anniversary of the event that precipitated the eruption of World War I – the
assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo on June 28th
1914 – it is fitting that today’s New
York Times features several reflections on this historically pivotal day’s
counterfactual dimensions.
The first, entitled “If Franz Ferdinand Had Lived,” is written by journalist Simon Winder, the author of the
fascinating (and hilariously written) book, Germania,
and most recently, its sequel, Danubia.
Unfortunately, the essay
lacks Winder’s usual narrative punch.
The main problem is its misleading packaging. Given the relative absence of speculative
reasoning in the essay, I suspect that a Times
editor decided to provide the snappy title, thereby capitalizing on the recent
flurry of attention to the Great War’s counterfactual aspects (seen in Richard
Ned Lebow’s Archduke Franz Ferdinand Lives!, National Public Radio’s recent listener poll about the war’s “what
ifs?”, and Jack Beatty’s The Lost World of 1914: How the Great War Was Not Inevitable.
The most Winder offers by
way of counterfactuals is to highlight the existence of alternate possibilities
for the fate of the Austro-Hungarian Empire (whose demise Winder bemoans) short
of dissolution in war.
Winder writes:
“There were many possibilities
before 1914. One ingenious proposal was for a United States of Austria, which would have carved the empire
into a series of federal language-based states, including small urban enclaves
to protect (but also isolate) German speakers. This could have been achieved
only by the destruction of Magyar imperialism, but Franz Ferdinand at different
points seems to have seen this as worth risking.”
Winder goes on to speculate:
“We will never know if such schemes
might have worked. But these are ghosts that have haunted Europe ever since —
possibilities whose disappearance unleashed evils inconceivable in the stuffy,
hypocritical, but relatively decent and orderly world of the Hapsburg empire.”
In other words, the nightmares of
real history allow us to fantasize about what might have been. Had the archduke lived, they might have
been realized, which Winder confirms by showing how his death paved the way for
Austria-Hungary’s reckless decision to go to war. He writes that the assassins “could not have known…that
Franz Ferdinand was probably the most senior antiwar figure in Central Europe,
a man acutely aware of Hapsburg weakness, scathing about the delusions of his
generals and a close friend of the German monarch, Kaiser Wilhelm. The recklessness and stupidity of the Hapsburg
response to the assassination — the ultimatum of humiliating demands served on Serbia, a response so crucial to the outbreak
of the World War I — would not have occurred in the face of some other
provocative outrage that had left Franz Ferdinand alive.”
As far as things go, this is
counterfactually true, but not particularly insightful. And it certainly is not much of an
analytical pay-off for readers attracted to the article by its alluring
title.
That said, it may be a good sign
for the popularity of counterfactual history if editors are increasingly
tempted to exploit its appeal – even in the cause of false advertising.
It is all the more
interesting, therefore, that the most insightful counterfactual observation in
today’s Times comes from historian
Max Hastings, who is quoted in Steven Erlanger’s title page story, “The War to End All Wars,” that “Germany could have dominated Europe in 20 years
economically if only it had not gone to war. “The supreme irony of 1914 is how many of the rulers of
Europe grossly overestimated military power and grossly underestimated economic
power.”
This claim is probably true.
Had the Kaiser’s government decided not to push for war in 1914 (and used
economics as a tool of “war by other means”), it probably would have been more
successful in the long run in promoting the Germany’s national interests. Given the country’s political culture
at the time, however -- especially the place of primacy enjoyed by the Prussian
army – it was never going to be easy to have the latter stand down in the event
of a military crisis. And so Hastings’
“what if?” remains a wistful one.
Comments
Thanks for sharing, nice post! Post really provice useful information!
Giaonhan247 chuyên dịch vụ vận chuyển hàng đi mỹ cũng như dịch vụ ship hàng mỹ từ dịch vụ nhận mua hộ hàng mỹ từ trang ebay vn cùng với dịch vụ mua hàng amazon về VN uy tín, giá rẻ.