John Judis's Counterfactual Reflections on World War II and the Federal Government Shutdown
In his latest New Republic essay
on the Federal Government shutdown, John Judis offers an interesting
counterfactual validation of World War II’s positive effects upon postwar American
history.
In his essay, Judis
describes the role of Republicans in eroding America’s social contract – the belief
in the importance of a strong central government.
After discussing the role of John Calhoun’s anti-government radicals and their pursuit of nullification in the early to mid-19th century, he describes “the rise in 1937 of a conservative coalition of conservative Southern Democrats and rural Midwestern Republicans to block and repeal the New Deal through parliamentary maneuvers and investigations.” This reactionary movement temporarily faded from view, however, “because in 1941 Americans went to war against Nazi Germany and Japan. World War II unified Americans. In modern wars, the national government has to call upon all its citizens to do their part and to submerge their differences. Business made peace with labor; blacks served alongside whites. And that spirit of national unification lasted for 15 years after the war. It helped to give rise—although not without conflict—to a social compact between business and labor, an end to racial segregation and the preservation and expansion of New Deal programs like social security.”
To reinforce this point, Judis adds the
rhetorically powerful observation that “If
World War II had not intervened, it’s very likely that the conservative
coalition would have grown stronger, and would have been able to stop the
expansion of, if not undermine, social security.”
As it happened, the consensus broke
down in the turbulent 1960s as Southern Democrats switched to the Republican
Party and drove the GOP into its present-day reactionary stance.
Judis’s prediction is that the GOP
will continue to behave in this fashion and “the largest effect is likely to be
continued dysfunction in Washington, which if it continues over a decade or so,
will threaten economic growth and America’s standing in the world, undermine
social programs like the Affordable Care Act, and probably encourage more
radical movements on the right and the left. Think of Italy, Greece, or Weimar
Germany. Or think about what the United
States would have been like if World War II had not occurred, and if Europe,
the United States, and Japan had failed to pull themselves out of the Great
Depression.”
Judis’s “what ifs?” underscore how
important World War II was for the United States’s early postwar
stability. It is indeed arguably
the case that without its unifying impact upon the country, we would be much
worse off today. It's awkward to have
to admit that we benefited so dramatically from a war that cost 55 million
people their lives worldwide. But
it seems undeniable.
Comments